Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-26509

Both priority and type have 2 required bindings but only one has required values…

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

    Details

    • Type: Change Request
    • Status: Resolved - change required (View Workflow)
    • Priority: Highest
    • Resolution: Persuasive
    • Specification:
      US CARIN Real-time Pharmacy Benefit Check (RTPBC) (FHIR)
    • Work Group:
      Pharmacy
    • Related Artifact(s):
      RTPBC Request Profile (Claim)
    • Related Page(s):
      Profiles and Extensions
    • Resolution Description:
      Hide

      Remove redundant StructureDefinition entries for Claim.priority.coding and Claim.type.coding elements. 

      Show
      Remove redundant StructureDefinition entries for Claim.priority.coding and Claim.type.coding elements. 
    • Resolution Vote:
      Scott Robertson / Pooja Babbrah : 8-0-0
    • Change Category:
      Correction
    • Change Impact:
      Compatible, substantive
    • Applied for Version:
      0.1.0

      Description

      Both priority and type have 2 required bindings but only one has required values, what is the expectation with the second one? Is it a duplicate due to binding problems?

      Existing Wording:

      Both priority and type have 2 required bindings but only one has required values.

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

              People

              Assignee:
              Unassigned Unassigned
              Reporter:
              dzhang Daniel Zhang
              Watchers:
              1 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:
                Vote Date: