Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-26509

Both priority and type have 2 required bindings but only one has required values…

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive
    • Icon: Highest Highest
    • US CARIN Real-time Pharmacy Benefit Check (RTPBC) (FHIR)
    • Pharmacy
    • RTPBC Request Profile (Claim) [deprecated]
    • Profiles and Extensions
    • Hide

      Remove redundant StructureDefinition entries for Claim.priority.coding and Claim.type.coding elements. 

      Show
      Remove redundant StructureDefinition entries for Claim.priority.coding and Claim.type.coding elements. 
    • Scott Robertson / Pooja Babbrah : 8-0-0
    • Correction
    • Compatible, substantive
    • 0.1.0

    Description

      Both priority and type have 2 required bindings but only one has required values, what is the expectation with the second one? Is it a duplicate due to binding problems?

      Existing Wording:

      Both priority and type have 2 required bindings but only one has required values.

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            dzhang Daniel Zhang
            Watchers:
            1 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: