Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
-
Highest
-
US Da Vinci DEQM (FHIR)
-
0.1 [deprecated]
-
Clinical Quality Information
-
(NA)
-
2.2.4.2.1
-
-
Eric Haas/Floyd Eisenberg: 29-0-2
-
Clarification
-
Non-substantive
Description
This is a big assumption. How will data consumers communicate data requirements? In addition, how will data producers know which data collection operations (i.e., quality measures) they will be subject to? For instance, could a payer add or change quality measures without a physician knowing which ones they are being measured against? How will this be communicated back to the physician?Da Vinci Guiding Principles stipulate that responders (i.e., producers) have the ability to review and approve the content prior to release.
Existing Wording:
Collect Data: It is assumed that the Producer knows the data requirements for the measure.
Attachments
Issue Links
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-11578 Negative - Celine Lefebvre : 2020-Feb-QMEXCHANGE R1 STU
- Balloted