Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
-
Highest
-
US Da Vinci DEQM (FHIR)
-
0.1 [deprecated]
-
Clinical Quality Information
-
(NA)
-
2.2.4
-
-
Eric Haas/Linda Michaelsen:28-0-0
-
Enhancement
-
Compatible, substantive
Description
The “incremental” exchange process needs to be better fleshed out. Are we to assume the payer stores pieces of data and matches them up as they are sent by the provider? DHow does the provider know if something is missing to calculate the measure? Does the payer request the specific missing information at some point?
Existing Wording:
Data Exchange : Note that resources included in a Submit-Data bundle SHOULD be self-contained (in other words, should include all referenced resources in the data), unless the exchange is understood by both parties to be incremental . For example, if an Encounter references a Location, that Location is expected to be included in the bundle, unless the exchange is understood to be incremental and the sending system knows that it has already sent that particular Location as part of a previous submit.
Attachments
Issue Links
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-11573 Negative - Celine Lefebvre : 2020-Feb-QMEXCHANGE R1 STU
- Balloted