Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-25879

Should “other launches” be considered part of the spec?

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Icon: Highest Highest
    • FHIRCast (FHIR)
    • 0.1 [deprecated]
    • Imaging Integration
    • (NA)
    • Session Discovery
    • Hide

      Add a banner to the top of every page that is not part of the normative-track specification clearly indicating that the page contains Guidance and is not part of the specification. Currently, this would entail a new banner on the following pages:

      Show
      Add a banner to the top of every page that is not part of the normative-track specification clearly indicating that the page contains Guidance and is not part of the specification. Currently, this would entail a new banner on the following pages: https://fhircast.hl7.org/launch-scenarios/ https://fhircast.hl7.org/syncconsiderations/ https://fhircast.hl7.org/security-considerations/ https://fhircast.hl7.org/about/
    • Isaac Vetter / Eric Martin : 5-0-0
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive

    Description

      Should “other launches” be considered part of the spec? Some (eg: unguessable secrets) have not done well in the past, and weren’t considered part of the 1.0 release of the spec. We need to make clear what is and isn’t included/validated.

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            jenni_syed Jenni Syed (Inactive)
            Watchers:
            3 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: