Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-24938

Resolution of Tracker 20602 did not address the comment

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

    Details

    • Type: Change Request
    • Status: Applied (View Workflow)
    • Priority: Medium
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Specification:
      FHIR Core (FHIR)
    • Raised in Version:
      STU3
    • Work Group:
      Patient Care
    • Related Artifact(s):
      Procedure
    • Resolution Description:
      Hide

      Update definition of recorded = The date the occurrence of the procedure was first captured in the record regardless of Procedure.status (potentially after the occurrence of the event).

      Show
      Update definition of recorded = The date the occurrence of the procedure was first captured in the record  regardless of Procedure.status (potentially after the occurrence of the event).
    • Resolution Vote:
      Emma Jones / Rob Hausam : 4-0-0
    • Change Category:
      Correction
    • Change Impact:
      Non-substantive

      Description

      Tracker 20602 asked for the ability to indicate a timing for a procedure not done for reason. The result was to add a new attribute, Procedure.recorded as follows:

      Add Procedure.*recorded *as 0..1 dateTime with

      short description: "When the procedure was first captured in the subject's record"

      definition: "The date the occurrence of the title was first captured in the record - potentially significantly after the occurrence of the event"

      update mappings to workflow event.recorded

      The language does not provide leeway to indicate a dateTime when a decision was made to avoid a procedure.

      An example of potential wording to address the timing initially requested can be found in MedicationAdministration.effective[x]: "A specific date/time or interval of time during which the administration took place (or did not take place, when the 'notGiven' attribute is true). For many administrations, such as swallowing a tablet the use of dateTime is more appropriate."

      Request modification of language to address the "not-done for reason" use case that is currently excluded based on the description. Consider, "The date the occurrence of the title was first captured in the record (or did not take place, when the 'Procedure.status not-done' is present) - potentially significantly after the occurrence of the event"

        Attachments

          Issue Links

            Activity

              People

              Assignee:
              Unassigned Unassigned
              Reporter:
              feisenberg Floyd Eisenberg
              Watchers:
              2 Start watching this issue

                Dates

                Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved:
                Vote Date: