Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-24233

Personas vs Patient - CPG #120

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Persuasive with Modification
    • Icon: Medium Medium
    • Clinical Guidelines (FHIR)
    • STU3
    • Clinical Decision Support
    • (NA)
    • Documentation
    • Hide

      Will work with HTA to ensure we are referencing the external classification correctly.

      In addition, we will specify personas using the existing FHIR representation for those as currently specified by Patient, Practitioner, PractitionerRole, and RelatedPerson, and make clear that the personas code system is an example.

      Show
      Will work with HTA to ensure we are referencing the external classification correctly. In addition, we will specify personas using the existing FHIR representation for those as currently specified by Patient, Practitioner, PractitionerRole, and RelatedPerson, and make clear that the personas code system is an example.
    • Clarification
    • Compatible, substantive

    Description

      Existing Wording: Personas

      The personas identified in this implementation guide are defined based on the WHO recommendation for Classifying health workers.

      Comment:

      Structuring Recommendations: Please explain why existing FHIR constructs, including Patient, PractitionerRole, and the practice-codes value set are not specified. Is the community really ready to adopt this orthoganal approach?

      Summary:

      Personas vs Patient

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            Unassigned Unassigned
            Thomson.Kuhn Thomson Kuhn (Inactive)
            Watchers:
            4 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: