Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Persuasive
-
Medium
-
US Quality Measures (FHIR)
-
STU3
-
Clinical Quality Information
-
Profiles
-
N/A
-
-
Bryn Rhodes/Ben Hamlin: 19-0-0
-
Clarification
-
Non-compatible
Description
Existing Wording: CQL added capabilities for CQL Library namespaces. No reference is made in the IG regarding how this capability should be used.
Proposed Wording: Recommend adding a section around namespaces, specifically if there are any constraints that should be recommended or enforced.
Comment:
For a Library namespace, do we want to lock the namespace capability down, leave it open for implementations or provide a preference for what the namespace should be? Should we require a namespace (backwards incompatible) or leave it optional? If namespace is required, how should an existing library that have no namespace be resolved? Does the use of a namespace for an existing library with no namspace necessitate a new library 'family' and therefore create the need to set the library version back to 1.0, for example?
Summary:
Library namespace guidance
Attachments
Issue Links
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-8891 Affirmative - Stan Rankins : 2019-May-FHIR IG QM R1
- Closed