Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-18130

ObservationDefinition cardinality question LIVD

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Not Persuasive with Modification
    • Icon: Medium Medium
    • US LOINC – IVD Test Code (LIVD) (FHIR)
    • STU3
    • Orders & Observations
    • LIVD ObservationDefinition
    • (profiles) [deprecated]
    • 2.3
    • Hide

      There does not seem to be a use case for allowing multiple data types for results from a single observation definition. Furthermore, there is confusion about having this and three other fields not referenced in the white paper.

      Motion to find the item not persusasive with mod and make permittedDataType, method, quantitativeDetails, and validCodedValueSet

      Show
      There does not seem to be a use case for allowing multiple data types for results from a single observation definition. Furthermore, there is confusion about having this and three other fields not referenced in the white paper. Motion to find the item not persusasive with mod and make permittedDataType, method, quantitativeDetails, and validCodedValueSet
    • Rob Hausam/Ed Heierman: 6-0-4
    • Correction
    • Non-compatible

    Description

      Existing Wording

      ObservationDefinition\\permittedDataType
      Cardinality: 0..*

      Ballot Comment (Question)

      Does a single device produce results that would be reported in different formats requiring different data types? If not, should the cardinality be 0..1?

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            rhausam Robert Hausam
            f_hall Freida Hall
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: