Uploaded image for project: 'FHIR Specification Feedback'
  1. FHIR Specification Feedback
  2. FHIR-11217

Thoughts on combining SupplyRequest, DeviceUseRequest and VisionPrescription - 2016-09 core #371

    XMLWordPrintableJSON

Details

    • Icon: Change Request Change Request
    • Resolution: Not Persuasive with Modification
    • Icon: Medium Medium
    • FHIR Core (FHIR)
    • DSTU2
    • Orders & Observations
    • Workflow
    • 12.1.3
    • Hide

      Motion to consider:

      • VisionPrescription represents an authorization and specification for lenses.
        • While one could create many DeviceDefinitions, these are custom specifications while DeviceDefinition manages model specifications and is not an authorization.
      • Keep the name VisionPrescription as-is and address other custom specifications for later to sort out (e.g., pattern, some other more generic resource and use patterns where needed)
      • Address where VisionPrescription should be referenced in, e.g., DeviceRequest, in a separate JIRA and address other custom devices.
      • Clarify in VisionPrescription scope and boundary that it is not a SupplyRequest and describe the differences and use with other resources more clearly.
      Show
      Motion to consider: VisionPrescription represents an authorization and specification for lenses. While one could create many DeviceDefinitions, these are custom specifications while DeviceDefinition manages model specifications and is not an authorization. Keep the name VisionPrescription as-is and address other custom specifications for later to sort out (e.g., pattern, some other more generic resource and use patterns where needed) Address where VisionPrescription should be referenced in, e.g., DeviceRequest, in a separate JIRA and address other custom devices. Clarify in VisionPrescription scope and boundary that it is not a SupplyRequest and describe the differences and use with other resources more clearly.
    • Dan Rutz / Alexander Henket : 9-0-1
    • Clarification
    • Non-substantive

    Description

      Existing Wording: Supply Request, DeviceUseRequest, VisionPrescription

      Comment:

      Patient is required in DeviceUseRequest, while optional in the other two - IF that remains the case, then need to stay separate.

      VisionPrescription does have specific elements that the others dont have and is common, so whether it is a standard extension on DeviceUseRequest or its own resource does not matter so much - so keep separate

      Summary:

      Thoughts on combining SupplyRequest, DeviceUseRequest and VisionPrescription

      Attachments

        Activity

          People

            marti_velezis Marti Velezis
            RikiM Ulrike Merrick
            Watchers:
            2 Start watching this issue

            Dates

              Created:
              Updated:
              Resolved: