Details
-
Change Request
-
Resolution: Not Persuasive with Modification
-
Medium
-
FHIR Core (FHIR)
-
DSTU2
-
Orders & Observations
-
Workflow
-
12.1.3
-
-
Dan Rutz / Alexander Henket : 9-0-1
-
Clarification
-
Non-substantive
Description
Existing Wording: Supply Request, DeviceUseRequest, VisionPrescription
Comment:
Patient is required in DeviceUseRequest, while optional in the other two - IF that remains the case, then need to stay separate.
VisionPrescription does have specific elements that the others dont have and is common, so whether it is a standard extension on DeviceUseRequest or its own resource does not matter so much - so keep separate
Summary:
Thoughts on combining SupplyRequest, DeviceUseRequest and VisionPrescription
Attachments
Issue Links
- is voted on by
-
BALLOT-2999 Affirmative - Ulrike Merrick : 2018-Sep-FHIR R1
- Closed